Impairment Rating Ambiguity in the United States: The Utah Impairment Guides for Calculating Workers' Compensation Impairments
نویسندگان
چکیده
Since the implementation of workers' compensation, accurately and consistently rating impairment has been a concern for the employee and employer, as well as rating physicians. In an attempt to standardize and classify impairments, the American Medical Association (AMA) publishes the AMA Guides ("Guides"), and recently published its 6th edition of the AMA Guides. Common critiques of the AMA Guides 6th edition are that they are too complex, lacking in evidence-based methods, and rarely yield consistent ratings. Many states mandate use of some edition of the AMA Guides, but few states are adopting the current edition due to the increasing difficulty and frustration with their implementation. A clearer, simpler approach is needed. Some states have begun to develop their own supplemental guides to combat problems in complexity and validity. Likewise studies in Korea show that past methods for rating impairment are outdated and inconsistent, and call for measures to adapt current methods to Korea's specific needs. The Utah Supplemental Guides to the AMA Guides have been effective in increasing consistency in rating impairment. It is estimated that litigation of permanent impairment has fallen below 1% and Utah is now one of the least costly states for obtaining workers' compensation insurance, while maintaining a medical fee schedule above the national average. Utah's guides serve as a model for national or international impairment guides.
منابع مشابه
Permanent Partial Disability Awards and Wage Loss
Physicians handling workers compensation cases serve in a dual capacity not required of physicians treating non-workers compensation cases. Not only are they are asked to treat the workers’ injuries and disability symptoms, but they are also frequently asked to evaluate the extent of economic damage done to a worker via the assignment of an impairment rating to certain types of injuries. Althou...
متن کاملQuantifying mental and behavioural impairments in the context of catastrophic impairment analysis.
This article explores the quantification of mental and behavioural impairment in the context of catastrophic impairment as defined by the Ontario Statutory Accident Benefit Schedule (the "SABS"). It reviews the relevant areas of the SABS, along with key arbitrations, appeals and court rulings relevant to the issue of quantifying mental and behavioural impairments, as well as a psychological per...
متن کاملSurvey of methods for the rating of psychiatric impairment in Australia.
One of the enduring clinical issues in the assessment of plaintiffs in personal injury and workers' compensation claims, as well as applicants for social security and disablement benefits, is that of the evaluation of impairment and work incapacity. Many writers on this topic confuse the concepts of impairment and disability, and similar confusion is reflected in a number of the rating methods ...
متن کاملDeveloping Korean Academy of Medical Sciences Guideline for Rating the Impairment in Mental and Behavioral Disorders; A Comparative Study of KNPA's New Guidelines and AMA's 6th Guides
Quantifying and rating the impairments due to mental and behavior disorders are difficult for their own characteristics. Korean Academy of Medical Sciences (KAMS) is developing guidelines of rating impairment in mental and behavioral disorders based on Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA)'s new guidelines. We compared the new KNPA's guidelines and the American Medical Association (AMA)'s ...
متن کاملOp-pain160030 799..802
This commentary is in response to Drs. Feinberg and Brigham’s request for reader feedback of their 2014 revision of their 2006 “Guide to the Guides . . . ” [1]. They teach that its use improves rating accuracy. We concur. Their 2014 revision generates impairment rating protocols in injured workers that are based on the AMA Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, 5 Edition (GUIDES) [2]...
متن کامل